内容概述
毕达哥拉斯定理(欧几里得《原本》第一卷命题 47)自古便有多种推广:在欧几里得时代已有《原本》第六卷命题 31(将直角边、斜边上的正方形换成相似图形)与第二卷命题 12、13 的余弦定理雏形;真正惊人的推广来自亚历山大的帕普斯,他在《数学汇编》第四卷开篇给出:设 ABC 为任意三角形,在 CA、CB 上向外作任意平行四边形 CADE、CBFG,DE 与 FG 交于 H,作 AL、BM 平行且等于 HC,则平行四边形 ABML 的面积恰好等于两个原平行四边形面积之和。这一思路甚至可以推向三维:在任意四面体 ABCD 三个面上作任意三棱柱,所得三棱柱体积之和恰等于第四个三棱柱 ABC-NOP 的体积。
中文正文
89° 帕普斯对毕达哥拉斯定理的推广
[下面的文字经允许改编自伊弗斯在《数学教师》1958 年 11 月号 544~546 页"历史记述"里的文章。]
每个中学生早晚会熟悉著名的毕达哥拉斯定理:直角三角形斜边的正方形面积等于两个直角边的正方形面积之和。这个定理是写于公元前 300 年的欧几里得《原本》第一卷命题 47。
早在欧几里得时代,人们就已经知道了毕达哥拉斯定理的某些推广。例如,《原本》第六卷命题 31 说:直角三角形斜边上的图形的面积等于两个直角边上的相似图形的面积之和。这个推论不过是将原来直角三角形边上的正方形换成了相似构成的相似图形。更有意义的推论来自第二卷命题 12 和 13。两个推论的综合而现代的表述是:在三角形中,钝(锐)角对边的正方形的平方等于其余二边的平方和加(减)其中一边与另一边的投影的乘积的 2 倍。用图 13 的记号,就是 $(AB)^2 = (BC)^2 + (CA)^2 \pm 2(BC)(DC)$,加减号根据 $C$ 在三角形 $ABC$ 中是钝角或锐角来决定。
(图 13:左为钝角情形,右为锐角情形,分别在三角形 ABC 中作 $AD \perp BC$。)
如果用有向线段,我们可以将第二卷命题 12、13 与第一卷命题 47 综合为一个陈述:假如在三角形 $ABC$ 中,$AD$ 为 $BC$ 的高,那么 $(AB)^2 = (BC)^2 + (CA)^2 \pm 2(BC)(DC)$。因为 $DC = CA \cos BCA$,我们看到这个陈述就是所谓的余弦定理。余弦定理其实就是毕达哥拉斯定理的一个绝妙的推广。
然而,古希腊时代对毕达哥拉斯定理的最惊人的推广,也许来自亚历山大的帕普斯的《数学汇编》第四卷的开篇。帕普斯的推广是这样的(图 14):设 $ABC$ 为任意三角形,而 $CADE$ 和 $CBFG$ 为 $CA$ 和 $CB$ 边上的任意平行四边形。今 $DE$ 和 $FG$ 交于 $H$,作 $AL$ 和 $BM$ 平行并等于 $HC$。那么,平行四边形 $ABML$ 的面积等于 $CADE$ 与 $CBFG$ 的面积之和。证明很简单。因为我们有 $CADE = CAUH = SLAR$ 和 $CBFG = CBVH = SMBR$,于是,$CADE + CBFG = SLAR + SMBR = ABML$。我们应该注意,毕达哥拉斯定理在两个方向推广:直角三角形被取代为任意三角形,边上的正方形被取代为任意平行四边形。
(图 14:在 $\triangle ABC$ 的 $CA$、$CB$ 边外作平行四边形 $CADE$、$CBFG$,$DE$、$FG$ 交于 $H$,在 $AB$ 同侧作平行四边形 $ABML$ 使 $AL \parallel BM \parallel HC$。)
学几何的中学生大概都会对帕普斯的推广发生兴趣,而推广的证明也是他们很好的练习。也许几何天赋多的同学还愿意靠自己的力量把帕普斯的推广更进一步(推广到三维空间):令 $ABCD$ 为任意四面体(图 15),$ABD\text{-}EFG$,$BCD\text{-}HIJ$,$CAD\text{-}KLM$ 分别为 $ABD$、$BCD$、$CAD$ 三个面上的任意三棱柱。今 $Q$ 为 $EFG$、
(图 15:四面体 $ABCD$ 三面上各外接一三棱柱 $ABD\text{-}EFG$、$BCD\text{-}HIJ$、$CAD\text{-}KLM$。)
英文正文
89° Pappus's extension of the Pythagorean Theorem. [The following is adapted, with permission, from the article, by Howard Eves, of the same title that appeared in the Historically Speaking section of The Mathematics Teacher, November, 1958, pp. 544–546.]
Every student of high school geometry sooner or later becomes familiar with the famous Pythagorean Theorem, which states that in a right triangle the area of the square described on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares described on the two legs. This theorem appears as Proposition 47 in Book I of Euclid's Elements, written about 300 B.C.
Even in Euclid's time, certain generalizations of the Pythagorean Theorem were known. For example, Proposition 31 of Book VI of the Elements states: In a right triangle the area of a figure described on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the areas of similar figures similarly described on the two legs. This generalization merely replaced the three squares on the three sides of the right triangle by any three similar and similarly described figures. A more worthy generalization stems from Propositions 12 and 13 of Book II. A combined and somewhat modernized statement of these two propositions is: In a triangle, the square of the side opposite an obtuse (acute) angle is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides increased (decreased) by twice the product of one of these sides and the projection of the other side on it. That is, in the notation of Figure 13, $(AB)^2 = (BC)^2 + (CA)^2 \pm 2(BC)(DC)$, the plus or minus sign being taken according as angle $C$ of triangle $ABC$ is obtuse or acute.
(Figure 13: two triangles, illustrating the obtuse case (left) and the acute case (right), with $AD \perp BC$ in each.)
If we employ directed line segments we may combine Propositions 12 and 13 of Book II and Proposition 47 of Book I into the single statement: If in triangle $ABC$, $D$ is the foot of the altitude on side $BC$, then $(AB)^2 = (BC)^2 + (CA)^2 - 2(BC)(DC)$. Since $DC = CA \cos BCA$, we recognize this last statement as essentially the so-called law of cosines, and the law of cosines is indeed a fine generalization of the Pythagorean Theorem.
But perhaps the most remarkable extension of the Pythagorean Theorem that dates back to the days of Greek antiquity is that given by Pappus of Alexandria at the start of Book IV of his Mathematical Collection. The Pappus extension of the Pythagorean Theorem is as follows (see Figure 14): Let $ABC$ be any triangle and $CADE$, $CBFG$ any parallelograms described externally on sides $CA$ and $CB$. Let $DE$ and $FG$ meet in $H$ and draw $AL$ and $BM$ equal and parallel to $HC$. Then the area of parallelogram $ABML$ is equal to the sum of the areas of parallelograms $CADE$ and $CBFG$. The proof is easy, for we have $CADE = CAUH = SLAR$ and $CBFG = CBVH = SMBR$. Hence $CADE + CBFG = SLAR + SMBR = ABML$. It is to be noted that the Pythagorean Theorem has been generalized in two directions, for the right triangle in the Pythagorean Theorem has been replaced by any triangle, and the squares on the legs of the right triangle have been replaced by any parallelograms.
(Figure 14: parallelograms $CADE$ and $CBFG$ constructed externally on sides $CA$ and $CB$ of $\triangle ABC$, with $DE$ and $FG$ meeting at $H$, and parallelogram $ABML$ drawn on $AB$ with $AL \parallel BM \parallel HC$.)
The student of high school geometry can hardly fail to be interested in the Pappus extension of the Pythagorean Theorem, and the proof of the extension can serve as a nice exercise for the student. Perhaps the more gifted student of geometry might like to try his hand at establishing the further extension (to three-space) of the Pappus extension: Let $ABCD$ (see Figure 15) be any tetrahedron and let $ABD\text{-}EFG$, $BCD\text{-}HIJ$, $CAD\text{-}KLM$ be any three triangular prisms described externally on the faces $ABD$, $BCD$, $CAD$ of $ABCD$. Let $Q$ be the point of intersection of the planes $EFG$, $HIJ$, $KLM$, and let $ABC\text{-}NOP$ be the triangular prism whose edges $AN$, $BO$, $CP$ are translates of the vector $QD$. Then the volume of $ABC\text{-}NOP$ is equal to the sum of the volumes of $ABD\text{-}EFG$, $BCD\text{-}HIJ$, $CAD\text{-}KLM$. A proof analogous to the one given above for the Pappus extension can be supplied.
(Figure 15: tetrahedron $ABCD$ with three external triangular prisms $ABD\text{-}EFG$, $BCD\text{-}HIJ$, $CAD\text{-}KLM$, and the resulting prism $ABC\text{-}NOP$.)
相关题目
- 题目:
- 提示:
- 解答或证明:
我们可以从故事中思考什么
- 毕达哥拉斯定理从正方形(边上的正方形)到相似图形(《原本》VI.31)、再到任意平行四边形(帕普斯推广),究竟在放宽什么条件?
- 为什么帕普斯推广的证明只需一步"等积切割"(CADE = CAUH = SLAR)?背后是哪一类思想方法?
- 余弦定理与帕普斯推广之间有什么联系?能否把余弦定理看作帕普斯推广的一个特例?
- 如果把"面积和"换成"体积和",帕普斯推广会变成什么?三维版本的证明为什么可以"类比"得到?
核心知识点讲解:毕达哥拉斯定理及其推广
选择理由
故事的核心是毕达哥拉斯定理及其层层推广:从 Euclid I.47 → VI.31 → II.12/13(余弦定理)→ Pappus《数学汇编》IV 的平面推广,再推到三维四面体上的三棱柱推广。讲解这一推广链条,最能体现本故事的内核。
概念介绍
毕达哥拉斯定理陈述的是直角三角形三边之间的平方关系:$(AB)^2 + (BC)^2 = (CA)^2$。所谓"推广",是在保持某种等式结构的前提下,放宽定理的假设(直角→任意角、正方形→相似图形→任意平行四边形)并相应地调整结论(±2BC·DC、体积之和等)。
具体内容
- Euclid I.47:直角三角形斜边上的正方形面积等于两直角边上正方形面积之和。
- Euclid VI.31:将上述"正方形"放宽为"相似图形",结论仍为"斜边上图形 = 两直角边上图形之和"。
- Euclid II.12 / II.13:在任意三角形中,对钝角(锐角)边的平方等于其余两边平方之和加(减)2 倍"一边×另边在该边上的投影",这正是余弦定理 $(AB)^2 = (BC)^2 + (CA)^2 \pm 2(BC)(DC)$。
- Pappus《数学汇编》IV:在 $\triangle ABC$ 边 $CA$、$CB$ 外作任意平行四边形 $CADE$、$CBFG$,延长其外边交于 $H$,以 $HC$ 为对应边在 $AB$ 上作平行四边形 $ABML$,则 $S_{ABML} = S_{CADE} + S_{CBFG}$。
- 三维推广:在四面体 $ABCD$ 的三个面 $ABD$、$BCD$、$CAD$ 上外接三棱柱,第四个三棱柱 $ABC\text{-}NOP$ 的体积恰等于三棱柱体积之和。
应用场景
- 等积变换是平面与立体几何中处理面积与体积问题的统一语言(如勾股定理的面积证明、圆的面积推导、祖暅原理等)。
- 帕普斯推广所体现的"用向量或平移保持大小相等"的思想,是现代向量几何、张量分析的雏形。
- 三维推广与多面体体积分解、有限元思想有天然的对应。
与生活的联系
在生活中做"拼图"或"移多补少"时,背后的几何本质就是等积变换:把一个图形切割后重新拼成另一个,保留面积或体积不变——这正是帕普斯推广证明的核心动作。
主要思想方法与延伸讨论
主要思想方法
- 等积变换:将复杂图形切割、旋转、平移后拼成简单图形,从而把"面积和"问题转化为"逐块相等"问题。
- 层层推广:从特殊到一般,依次放宽定理的假设(直角→任意角,正方形→相似图形→任意平行四边形,面积→体积)。
- 对偶类比:将平面结论"提升"到三维空间,对应地把面积换成体积、平行四边形换成三棱柱。
延伸讨论
- 帕普斯推广可否用向量法统一证明?若以 $H$ 为原点,$C$ 位置向量设为 $\vec{c}$,则 $AL$、$BM$ 的方向与大小关系能否写成简洁的向量等式?
- 三维推广的体积等式 $V_{ABC\text{-}NOP} = V_{ABD\text{-}EFG} + V_{BCD\text{-}HIJ} + V_{CAD\text{-}KLM}$ 是否可类比推广到更高维(如四维单纯形外接的四维"棱柱")?
- 与欧几里得"等积"思想(Euclid I.35–I.45)相比,帕普斯推广是"加法"型的等积,可否反过来做"减法"型推广?